1. I played this hand in Terra Linda recently as East.
Dlr: N Vul: NS
♠ A J 10 8 6
                       
♥ A J 8 2 
                       
♦ K 6 3 
                       
♣ 6           
♠ 4 3 
♥ K 6 5  
♦ 9 4 2         
♣ Q J 10 5 3 
 | 
  
  | 
  
 ♠ Q 7  
 ♥ Q 9 7 4 3  
 ♦  J 10 8  
 ♣ A K 9  
 | 
 |||||||||
                      
♠ K 9 5 2
                      
♥ 10  
                      
♦ A Q 7 5
                      
♣  8 7 4 2
North opened 1♠ and I overcalled 2♥ with a less than optimum hand. South bid 2♠ and pard bid 3♥. Amazingly, everyone passed and I played in 3♥. Down 4, minus 200 was, not surprisingly, an 85% board as NS can make a slam in spades! What happened?
The answer is that South under-valued his hand and failed to make a limit raise. He actually has a 7-loser hand, so could even consider forcing to game! Whether or not he forces to game, he should start with a bid of 3♥, showing a limit raise or better in spades. Admittedly, slam is not a good bet, as it depends on not losing a spade trick, but game should be easy to reach.
It is also possible that there was no competitive bidding at most tables, but that shouldn't be a reason for South to fail to use LTC and be very competitive with this hand.
2. I held this hand recently as North. After two passes I opened 1♠. Pard bid 2♠ and that was the final contract.
North opened 1♠ and I overcalled 2♥ with a less than optimum hand. South bid 2♠ and pard bid 3♥. Amazingly, everyone passed and I played in 3♥. Down 4, minus 200 was, not surprisingly, an 85% board as NS can make a slam in spades! What happened?
The answer is that South under-valued his hand and failed to make a limit raise. He actually has a 7-loser hand, so could even consider forcing to game! Whether or not he forces to game, he should start with a bid of 3♥, showing a limit raise or better in spades. Admittedly, slam is not a good bet, as it depends on not losing a spade trick, but game should be easy to reach.
It is also possible that there was no competitive bidding at most tables, but that shouldn't be a reason for South to fail to use LTC and be very competitive with this hand.
2. I held this hand recently as North. After two passes I opened 1♠. Pard bid 2♠ and that was the final contract.
Dlr: S Vul: None
♠ A K Q 8 5
                       
♥ 5 3 
                       
♦ 9 5 
                       
♣ K 10 3 2          
♠ 9 6 2 
♥ A 10 9 8 4  
♦ J 5 2         
♣ A 6 
 | 
  
  | 
  
 ♠ J 3  
 ♥ K Q 7 6 2  
 ♦  K 10 4 3  
 ♣  5 4  
 | 
 |||||||||
                      
♠ 10 7 4
                      
♥ J  
                      
♦ A 8 7 6
                      
♣ Q J 9 8 7
A club was led and I made 5. It always makes 4. After the hand I asked my partner why, with 8 losers, he didn't bid 2♣, Drury, showing a limit raise. He admitted that he should have. Interestingly, most pairs didn't properly evaluate their hands and failed to reach game so our score was about average. It was definitely a lost opportunity, however.
Stay alert (as I tell my bridge students) and don't forget to use LTC for accurate hand evaluation!
See you at the table!

2 comments:
Thanks for sharing. Happy Holidays.
after the fit I think they can take a loser away from the resp hand and get to game.
Mark
Post a Comment