♠ J74
♥ AQ8
♦ Q102
♣ A964
What is your call?
While I had 13 points, I had 8 losers which meant the hand was not necessarily worth a game-forcing bid. Therefore I decided to start with a forcing notrump and try to get more information from partner before my next bid. I can always put the hand in game, make a 3-card limit raise, or perhaps even veer into notrump.
My fearless (reckless?) LHO came in with a double and Bob, my partner redoubled, showing a good hand. RHO bid 2 hearts and it was decision time. As I had hoped, I now had a lot of information.
For starters, the opponents were probably in big trouble. Secondly, LHO had values. Finally, my partner had a good hand as indicated by his redouble. Clearly we belonged in game, but several factors pointed to a notrump game:
- My hand was a balanced 4-3-3-3 with no ruffing values.
- All of the suits seemed to be adequately stopped.
- The partnership possessed extra values so that as many tricks were likely available in notrump as in a suit contract
- With the heart bid on my right a heart lead was likely.
- The omnipresent and overriding reason: We were playing matchpoints! (so that making that 10 point bonus was all-important)
♠ KQ1098
♥ K3
♦ AK
♣ Q1083
♠ J74
♥ AQ8
♦ Q102
♣ A964
11 tricks were easily available and we were rewarded with a near-70% board.
My LHO held: A/10742/9853/KJ52.
The keys to the hand were 1) staying out of slam and 2) bidding notrump. My partner admitted that if I had started with a 2 club game-forcing bid, it would have been virtually inmpossible to stay out of slam, and nearly half of the field did, indeed, bid to the slam. (One pair, remarkably, bid and made 6 due to an unlikely endplay. Charlene stripped the red suits and threw her opponent in with the {lucky for her, singleton!} ace of spades who had to then lead away from the king of clubs.)
Don't forget to count your losers!
See you at the table!