Sunday, August 18, 2013

Jennbridge: Poker, Florida bridge & Losing Trick Count

Back after a summer hiatus. Catching up with my correspondence, I have heard from Florida bridge teachers, received inquiries on losing trick count and have even heard from poker players!

**Professional poker has seen tremendous growth over the last decade.  Several of the game's current stars have come to poker from other mind sports such as Bridge and Chess. Here is a Carbon Poker Review about a reputable poker site open to everyone.
 
**I love those Florida bridge teachers! They're quite enthusiastic about losing trick account. Here are a couple of recent comments:

I would love to use your material. After your series appeared in the Bridge Bulletin, my partner and I used the principles and greatly improved our bidding. I teach losing trick count with my beginners because I believe it gives them the tools necessary to determine those tricky good 9 and 10 point hands. Most catch on.

I was delighted with your articles on losing trick count. Do you live anywhere close to Florida? Do you conduct seminars yourself?

 ** I have been asked about the different versions of losing trick count floating around.  All I can really say is that the system I use is simple and it works!  At the table, in the heat of battle, we need a system that is quick and easy to apply--as well as one that improves bidding accuracy.

Here is an example.  What do you respond with this hand when partner opens 1♠?

♠J1094
K2
10
♣AJ10865

You go into evaluation mode. At first glance, it is a nice-looking hand, but has only 9 high card points.  You pause and count your losers.

The hand has only 7 losers! (3 in spades, 1 in hearts, 1 in diamonds and 2 in clubs)  This makes the hand worth a game force opposite partner's 1♠ opening.    That decided, you think about your possible bids and eventually determine that your singleton diamond may be the feature of greatest interest to partner.  Accordingly, you jump to 4, a splinter bid showing shortness in diamonds, along with spade support.

Partner, holding the following hand, is delighted with this information, as the only weakness in his hand is diamonds.

♠AKQ85
AQ963
94
♣7

Partner's powerful 4 1/2 loser hand is more than suitable for slam and, after checking for aces with blackwood, the fine contract of 6♠ is reached.

♠J1094
K2
10
♣AJ10865

♠AKQ85
AQ963
94
♣7

It would be hard to find a line of play where this slam would not make.  This great 24-point slam is easy to bid when you use losing trick count!

Hope you're having a great summer--would love to hear from you with comments or questions!
My email address: jennife574@aol.com

See you at the table!

2 comments:

Memphis MOJO said...

Cute hand. Hope you've had a good summer and welcome back.

Larry H said...

On Board 10 7D is a very lucky make, it takes a C lead to give me any chance at all. 7S looks to be a much easier contract until you realize that a D lead from S sets the contract immediately.

The rest of the story is that during the actual auction, north doubled my 5D response (0 or 3) to Jennifer's 4Nt. After the hand I asked Jennifer why she push on to 7 when an opponent had announced that he essentially had a void, giving his partner a trump stack. Jennifer simply missed the opponents bid. Once she gave me the option of slams, I had no choice but to stay in 7D, hoping that she had enough D's to do the trick. Not sure why the opponent lead a C, but very fortunate that he did.